Skip to main content



Understanding Austin’s Prop q

The City of Austin will ask voters this November to approve a property tax increase.
Here’s what it means for you and for the region’s competitiveness.

What is a TRE?

Tax Rate Election (TRE) happens when a city adopts a budget that raises property tax revenues beyond what’s allowed by state law.

Under Texas law, cities can increase property tax revenues up to 3.5% per year without voter approval. This year, the City of Austin’s adopted budget exceeds that threshold, triggering a voter decision.

On November 4, Austin residents will decide whether to approve a 16.1% increase in city property tax revenues — more than four times the amount that could happen without an election.

How it Impacts me

If TRE Passes

  • +15.4% increase ($302 more/year for average homeowner; $964 per $1M in commercial value)
  • Total annual increase for typical household (taxes + fees): +$416

If TRE Fails

  • +5.3% increase ($105 more/year for average homeowner; $464 per $1M in commercial value)

Put simply: the TRE nearly triples the tax increase on residents and businesses compared to the state-allowed baseline.

How it impacts Austin's competitiveness

Affordability is more than a household issue — it’s an economic one.

  • Over the last 10 years, the typical Austin homeowner’s combined tax bill rose 67.7%, while local wages only grew 37%
  • Property taxes in Austin are already among the highest in Texas, with Travis County’s median property tax bill ranking #1 statewide in 2023
  • Every additional $1,000 in costs prices out an estimated 750 Austin-area households from the housing market

When taxes and fees climb faster than wages, they don’t just strain families and businesses — they undermine Austin’s ability to attract and retain talent, investment, and jobs.

Opportunity Austin’s strategy is clear: affordability is central to competitiveness. The TRE is one moment in a larger affordability challenge that affects the region’s long-term economic health.

FAQs

The City of Austin is asking your permission to raise your taxes. The City Council is relying on a large increase in property tax revenues to pay for their city budget, reducing affordability for homeowners, renters, and businesses. The proposed tax increase is large enough that state law requires voter approval through something called a Tax Rate Election (TRE). On November 4th, the city will ask voters to approve this tax increase via Proposition Q. If voters approve the TRE, the city’s tax rate will increase by 20%. 

A TRE is an election giving voters a choice on how much their tax bill increases. It happens because state law requires local governments to ask voters to approve large property tax increases. 

 

By law local governments can collect up to 3.5% more property tax revenues every year. If the taxing entity exceeds that amount, it triggers a state law requiring voter approval via a TRE.

The key point to understand is the 3.5% limitation relates to city revenues, not an individual property tax bill. Austin is holding a TRE because the Austin City Council adopted a budget that collects roughly $110 million more in property taxes than state law allows. Based on city data, the proposed TRE is 350% more than the state limit. 

 

Unquestionably, the answer is yes. Who will be affected is the bigger issue. According to the National Association of Homebuilders, every $1,000 increase in the cost of a home in Austin prices 750 families out of the housing market. With the city estimating an increase of $416, county taxes increasing of $200, and Central Health increasing $64, Austinites face a more than $680 increase in 2026 alone. That means hundreds of Austin’s most-vulnerable and cost-sensitive families getting priced out of the housing market. 

If voters pass the TRE on Nov. 4, the city’s data estimates the average taxpayer (defined as owning a home with an assessed value of $494,803) will pay an extra $302.68 per year. A commercial property would see an increase of roughly $964 per million dollars of value. If the TRE does not pass, the city’s data estimates the same homeowner’s bill will only increase by about $105 per year. The commercial property would see an increase of roughly $464 per million dollars of value. In other words, for homeowners, voting for the TRE means voting to triple your tax increase.

Property tax increases hit everyone, including renters. When property taxes increase, monthly rents go up in response. Current data suggests that renters will see an average rent increase of $189.36/year ($15.78/month) if the TRE passes. That is an average across the entire city, meaning some increases may be smaller while others could be much higher. 

Austin’s track record says no. The only way this could be a one-time tax increase is if the City Council decided to decrease spending and collect less tax revenue next year. The last time the city’s property tax collections decreased was 20 years ago in 2005. 

The 3.5% annual increase allowed by state law means every tax increase compounds. If the TRE passes, the higher tax rate becomes the new baseline for future years, and the city can increase 3.5% from that higher amount. Looking ahead, if the TRE passes and future City Councils only collect the extra 3.5% allowed by law each year, by 2030 the city’s collections would increase more than 33% over five years. Rejecting the TRE would limit that increase to just 19%. 

No, the city is increasing a number of other rates and fees, including a 9% rate increase for services from Austin Water, a 5% increase from Austin Energy (each year for five years), and several other fees. The city’s estimates show the major rate and fee increase for the typical tax and rate payer totaling $416 if the TRE passes. The city’s budget also contains a 45-page list of fee increases that exceed 10%. 

The City Council voted for a $110 million list of programs and expenses. Community Impact notes that the funding is targeted “for homelessness services, housing assistance, parks and public facilities, public health and safety, and other city services.” It’s worth mentioning that some of the Prop Q funds will go into the city’s savings account. The Council aims to keep its reserve fund at 17% of General Fund spending. Because the budget increases spending by $415 million, they need to increase their savings account balance to maintain that 17% ratio. 

Maybe. The city would have to re-visit the budgeting process and find ways to reduce spending by an amount equivalent to the TRE revenues they can no longer collect. In that process, the city can reconsider and make changes to the budget. Critics of the process have said the city intentionally put certain priorities in the TRE package because they think it will attract votes. The programs and expenses used to justify the need for a TRE can still be funded if the City Council decides to restructure their priorities. 

Your tax rate and tax bill is entirely dependent on the budgets set by local elected officials. Local governments adopt their budget and set a corresponding property tax rate that will raise the amount of revenue needed to fund the budget. If local elected officials spent zero dollars, your tax bill would be zero. 

Your property tax rate and bill are determined solely by the budget a local government adopts. The State simply has a law giving voters the right to deny large property tax increases. Historically, local governments could raise property tax revenues by up to 8% each year without voter approval. In 2019, the Legislature lowered that threshold to 3.5%. Any increase above this level now requires voter approval. Interestingly, the increase from this year’s TRE proposal would still be double the voter approval threshold under the old law. 

The legislature’s goal was to protect taxpayers from excessive local government budget growth, which was causing property taxes to increase at unsustainable rates. Increasing revenues by 8% every year means property tax collections could double every 9 years. The legislature’s goal was to slow that growth substantially, prevent individual property tax bills from ballooning, and give voters a meaningful voice in their local taxation. 

The math works like this: 

  1. Look up your property value on the Appraisal District’s website 
  2. Estimate your tax bill for next year at travistaxes.com (next year’s tax info is labeled as “2025 adopted”) 
  3. View your current and past tax bills on the Travis County Tax Office website 

There may be deductions for homestead exemptions, but it’s generally that simple. For more detailed information, you can use these resources. 

It depends on the budget adopted by local elected officials each year. Even if Austin doesn’t do another TRE next year, that doesn’t prevent another local government, like the county or AISD, from holding one. Additionally, the city is planning for a different type of tax increase in 2026, called a Bond Election. In July 2025, city staff recommended the Bond Election be limited to $687 million, but the City Council could choose a higher amount. As the Austin Monitor noted, the $687 million price tag would mean a property tax increase of $100 for the average homeowner. Add that to this year’s TRE request, and the City Council could raise their portion of the average property tax bill by at least $400 over the next two years. 

Austin's Affordability Context

Housing costs remain higher than pre-pandemic levels, with property taxes and fees adding to the strain. Travis County’s median property tax bill was the highest in Texas in 2023 at $7,487

“When property taxes outpace wage growth nearly 2-to-1, it undermines quality of life and business competitiveness.”

Resources & further reading

For comparisons, check out some recent news on municipal budgets from other metros across the country. 

Houston approves new $7B budget, despite protesters’ opposition – The $7 billion budget is a $160 million increase compared to the FY 2024-25 budget. The city will have a general fund of $3.03 billion, a $74.5 million decrease from FY 2024-25.

Full story on Community Impact >>

Greater Houston Partnership’s Response: Full Story

“We applaud Mayor Whitmire for making hard choices to put forward a balanced budget proposal,” said Steve Kean, President and CEO of the Greater Houston Partnership. “The mayor has made good on his commitment to address waste and duplication, and the Partnership is committed to working with his administration to put the City on a sustainable path, delivering the quality services Houstonians expect.”

Dallas City Manager Kim Tolbert says the City Council will receive the proposed budget on Aug. 12. Early projections for the city of Dallas’ 2026 revenue indicate a gap between expected income and expenses.

City staff told council members Wednesday there’s an estimated $36.5 million variance between projected revenue and known expenses for the upcoming fiscal year. The forecast includes $1.956 billion in projected revenue and $2.001 billion in projected expenses.

Full Story on NBCDFW >>

Budget cuts were a top concern for Arlington’s city council Tuesday as it works to set priorities at a quarterly meeting.

The city is looking at a $25.1 million gap in funding after changes at the Tarrant Appraisal District (TAD), which decided it will not reassess the value of homes in the county for two years.

The projected increases in property value are a major way the city plans for its future budgets, and it’s left Arlington and other cities scrambling to cut budgets.

City Manager Trey Yelverton told the city council and heads of city departments that cuts are inevitable, including to staffing and pay.

Full Story on Forth Worth Report >>

Facing a widening budget deficit, the next San Antonio City Council may have to make some hard budget decisions.

While city revenue growth is lagging more than expected, the city is facing a small deficit in the current budget’s general fund. Though city staff said the current budget year’s $2.4 million deficit is “manageable,” that gap is set to expand quickly in years to come as expenses outpace growth.

They forecast the deficit will grow to $30.8 million in Fiscal Year 2026 and $148.3 million tin Fiscal Year 2027.

Full story on KSAT >>

People who and pay taxes in Raleigh will get a bit of a break from taxes. The city adopted its 2026 fiscal year budget, and it doesn’t include raising property taxes. However, it does include increase in some city services fees.

City manager, Marchell Adams-David, submitted the proposed $1.78 billion budget on May 20.

According to the city, the theme of the proposed budget, “Our Greatest Asset: Our Workforce,” is illustrated by the implementation of a comprehensive classification and compensation study. The study has delivered a new structure for more than 7,000 employees in more than 450 different job types. The total funding required for implementation is $35 million. In anticipation of the study results, the City set aside a penny of the tax rate – $11.4 million in fiscal year 2025. The remaining resources to fund the compensation study were realized from savings and careful budget planning that still ensures a strong fiscal position for the organization, the city says on its website.

Opportunity Austin is committed to keeping our investors informed. We’ll continue to share updates and resources to help you understand how local fiscal decisions shape our region’s affordability and long-term competitiveness. Explore the FAQs, review the data, and share these insights with your networks.